New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
Hi
Here is something that I have been meaning to finish for a while and I finally got to test it at HSC 'BiG TracK' last night.
It's mainly wire - big wire as you can see - a lot of .078, .093 and some .125 for the front axle struts - it's a b----r to bend!
The body is mounted onto a floating raft - it doesn't move much though as I believe that it is the actual weight separation that makes these things work rather than the actual way the weight is separated and moves - just my thoughts. Weight came out exactly what I was aiming for - as a matter of interest if you have never measured it a completed Retro CanAm will weigh in at : Chassis Weight including front axle and rear bearings plus 50 grams give or take a couple of grams with slight differences in running gear. It works a treat and was cutting very smooth 5.4's on the fast lanes - a little out of sorts on the drivers turn on Red and White but some tuning to b done.
Here is something that I have been meaning to finish for a while and I finally got to test it at HSC 'BiG TracK' last night.
It's mainly wire - big wire as you can see - a lot of .078, .093 and some .125 for the front axle struts - it's a b----r to bend!
The body is mounted onto a floating raft - it doesn't move much though as I believe that it is the actual weight separation that makes these things work rather than the actual way the weight is separated and moves - just my thoughts. Weight came out exactly what I was aiming for - as a matter of interest if you have never measured it a completed Retro CanAm will weigh in at : Chassis Weight including front axle and rear bearings plus 50 grams give or take a couple of grams with slight differences in running gear. It works a treat and was cutting very smooth 5.4's on the fast lanes - a little out of sorts on the drivers turn on Red and White but some tuning to b done.
Last edited by Mark Fox on Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Regards - Mark
"Do Less with More Focus"
"Do Less with More Focus"
Re: New Drive for BTR
Thanks for sharing again. You must have used an hydraulic press to bend the wire that supports the front axle!!
Neil
Neil
Re: New Drive for BTR
No but I had to re-anchor the vice to my table and I thought I was going to break itneiljb wrote:You must have used an hydraulic press to bend the wire that supports the front axle!!
Regards - Mark
"Do Less with More Focus"
"Do Less with More Focus"
Re: New Drive for BTR
Nice one Mark,,,,,,,,super strength and light and best of all its pretty,,,,,Its an artwork
Darryl
Darryl
Re: New Drive for BTR
Hi Mark.I am very interexted to see how this one goes.I built a couple very similar in desig n for Raceworld a couple of years ago.I gave one away,it worked great,the other one I kept wasnt so hot.Nice clean build as usual mate.Regards Brad.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 5:20 pm
- Location: Sydney/Australia
Re: New Drive for BTR
Thanks for posting Mark,
I would not have thought of going that thick of wire on a chassis. Very interesting and opposite to what they seem to be doing in the states.
BTW: I am enjoying and appreciate all your posts and probably don't thank you as I should.
regards
Greg
I would not have thought of going that thick of wire on a chassis. Very interesting and opposite to what they seem to be doing in the states.
BTW: I am enjoying and appreciate all your posts and probably don't thank you as I should.
regards
Greg
Re: New Drive for BTR
Thanks for the kind words guys.
The basic design is as as old as and I'm sure the design certainly went well on the King Brad.
Re Greg's comment:-
I have built quite a few multi-rail cars as well and they go fine but have a look on Slotblog at some of the CanAm cars built and inspired by Bryan Warmack - 0.125 rails albeit flattened - go figure
A lot of decisions I make in a build are all about expedience.
For example in this build the rails are .078.
The tubes holding the raft/outrigger 'pans' have a .015 wall thickness.
This means that the bottom of the outrigger supports are .093 off the deck.
Bingo - just use .093 wire to construct the pans - strong and no mucking around to get the levels right.
QED
The basic design is as as old as and I'm sure the design certainly went well on the King Brad.
Re Greg's comment:-
The only thick wire of any actual consequence here is the 078 rails - all the rest really just replace Brass plate to a degree excepting for the front axle struts.Greg Erskine wrote:I would not have thought of going that thick of wire on a chassis. Very interesting and opposite to what they seem to be doing in the states.
I have built quite a few multi-rail cars as well and they go fine but have a look on Slotblog at some of the CanAm cars built and inspired by Bryan Warmack - 0.125 rails albeit flattened - go figure
A lot of decisions I make in a build are all about expedience.
For example in this build the rails are .078.
The tubes holding the raft/outrigger 'pans' have a .015 wall thickness.
This means that the bottom of the outrigger supports are .093 off the deck.
Bingo - just use .093 wire to construct the pans - strong and no mucking around to get the levels right.
QED
Regards - Mark
"Do Less with More Focus"
"Do Less with More Focus"
Re: New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
Well I used this car at SSME to finish = 2nd with Darryl just behind Steve K and it was a really fast car setting fastest laps on 5 of 6 lanes but it seemed to have a lot of body vibration which I think came from the rattling body 'raft'.
Given that it showed real potential I decided to go back to a hinged pan type of layout which incidentally was what I planned originally before I got carried away.
Anyway here she is with hinges and a bit more rear bracket bracing.
Given that it showed real potential I decided to go back to a hinged pan type of layout which incidentally was what I planned originally before I got carried away.
Anyway here she is with hinges and a bit more rear bracket bracing.
Regards - Mark
"Do Less with More Focus"
"Do Less with More Focus"
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 5:20 pm
- Location: Sydney/Australia
Re: New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
Thanks for keeping us updated!
If I could ask a few question....
Do you set your front wheels to permanently touch the track?
How many thou do you space your guide?
regards
Greg
If I could ask a few question....
Do you set your front wheels to permanently touch the track?
How many thou do you space your guide?
regards
Greg
Re: New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
Absolutely - this is critical for these cars. I take the body off the car and roll it around the track on the corners and on all of the lanes to ensure the front wheels are turning.Greg Erskine wrote:Do you set your front wheels to permanently touch the track?
The guide is spaced such that the front wheels are always touching as explained above plus an extra 10 - 20 thou. When you push down on the guide post (body off) the rear wheels should lift off the track as the car will use the front wheels as a fulcrum if the set up is correct.Greg Erskine wrote:How many thou do you space your guide?
Hope this makes sense - happy to discuss when I next see you.
Regards - Mark
"Do Less with More Focus"
"Do Less with More Focus"
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 5:20 pm
- Location: Sydney/Australia
Re: New Drive (CanAm) for BTR
Thanks Mark,
I understand.
regards
Greg
I understand.
regards
Greg